2.9 gOS gOS Space Review
Final Verdict: another clone-buntu. Although they have been corrected many of the bugs that plagued the previous version, the abandonment of Enlightenment, for the most complete Gnome, dramatically shows this distribution, service-oriented Web 2.0 (see Gooooogle in the first place) nell'alveo of copy-buntu. Only the graphics, especially attractive, however, change. Although the default installation of flash player, audio / video formats, ect ect, you know already seen (see Linux Mint). Actually I do not mind that much, the brown of Ubuntu is objectively unwatchable, but ... as usual "decide on the hardware." The usual problems with Compiz portable video cards and drivers seem insormantabili closed. Sure to give any effect as the cube can ... but you should not! The new version of Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron has not named the same problems. I suspect it's a question of the kernel (which manages hardware peripherals, just as the video card) used in gOS. In short, the graphics pussy (and I repeat very mac-style) if not enough then compiz does not go! A point I keep Ubuntu I'm not? Maybe I'll plant the graphics ... gOS rating 7 / 10. Ps the test was done in both live and full installation. Speed \u200b\u200bdefinitely better system of Ubuntu, distro-usability of the mother.
0 comments:
Post a Comment